Tax resolution provider
Contact details, services, coverage, pricing information, and source-linked records in one profile.
Provider overview
Basic listing information from the provider’s published pages.
Provider-published website
States a free consultation, by web form
Provider source · checked
Describes itself as a nationwide tax consultation firm
Provider source · checked
Not published
Provider source · checked
Describes a team of tax professionals and CPAs
Provider source · checked
Describes over 50 years of combined experience
Provider source · checked
Describes a two-step process: evaluating the case, then designing a resolution plan
Provider source · checked
States a free consultation, by web form
Provider source · checked
The provider’s privacy policy states that payments may be refunded within the first 3 calendar days, and says its money-back guarantee applies only to the Investigation Phase—not the Immediate Action Team or Resolution Phase Addendum
Provider source · checked
Reviews across the web
5 matched review sources
Current public rating and review count from each exact profile we could match. TRC does not calculate a blended score.
Observed
4.7 / 5
323 reviews
Positive takeaway
Positive reviewers praise approachable representatives and clear initial explanations.
Critical takeaway
Critical reviews report case-manager turnover and communication fading after payment.
Repeated pattern
Observed
3 / 5
37 reviews
Positive takeaway
Customers often describe attentive case support and regular reassurance.
Critical takeaway
Some reviewers say the final outcome was a standard payment plan rather than the reduction they expected.
Reviewer report
Observed
4 / 5
13 reviews
Positive takeaway
Some clients report satisfactory agreements or other progress with tax agencies.
Critical takeaway
Severe accounts allege thousands in fees with little visible work or a worse balance afterward.
Reviewer report
Observed
4.75 / 5
120 reviews
Positive takeaway
Customers often describe attentive case support and regular reassurance.
Critical takeaway
Some reviewers say the final outcome was a standard payment plan rather than the reduction they expected.
Reviewer report
Observed
4.8 / 5
143 reviews
Positive takeaway
Positive reviewers praise approachable representatives and clear initial explanations.
Critical takeaway
Critical reviews report case-manager turnover and communication fading after payment.
Repeated pattern
Across all matched sources
Themes are a synthesis of public reviewer accounts, not independently verified outcomes. “Repeated pattern” is used only when multiple review narratives support it.
Ratings and counts can change after the observation date. Google and Yelp ratings apply to the linked business or location profile. BBB cards show customer-review scores, not BBB letter grades. Duplicate aggregators and ambiguous matches are omitted.
7 observed fields · 8 sourced entries
These statements come from the provider’s own published materials. TRC does not convert them into independently verified facts.
America’s Choice Tax
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
The provider also uses America’s Choice Tax Relief. The Better Business Bureau seal embedded on the same page names the entity America's Choice Tax Relief Inc.
View sourceDescribes a team of tax professionals and CPAs
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
No individual practitioner is named on the checked page and TRC has not checked any credential. The page’s own counters for specialists and years of experience render as '0+', so no figure could be observed there.
View sourceDescribes over 50 years of combined experience
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
Combined experience is not a founding date and not a headcount.
View sourceDescribes a two-step process: evaluating the case, then designing a resolution plan
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
View sourceThe provider’s privacy policy states that payments may be refunded within the first 3 calendar days, and says its money-back guarantee applies only to the Investigation Phase—not the Immediate Action Team or Resolution Phase Addendum
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
This is the provider’s published description of its refund limits. TRC has not reviewed the client agreement and takes no position on how the term is applied.
View sourceDescribes itself as a nationwide tax consultation firm
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
This is the provider’s description of its practice. It is not a licensing record.
View sourceStates a free consultation, by web form
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
View sourceNot published
Asserted by America's Choice Tax Relief · checked
No fee amount or fee schedule appeared on the checked page.
View source1 observed fields · 1 sourced entries
These fields come from a regulator, registry, licensing body, or licensed platform API—not from the provider’s marketing pages.
3 preparer tax identification number holders list this provider as their business: 3 with no professional designation recorded. By state: CA 3. The address most often given is 24630 Washington Ave, Murrieta CA 92562.
Established by Internal Revenue Service, PTIN holder Freedom of Information Act extract updated 2026-02-23 · checked
From the IRS Freedom of Information Act extract of PTIN holders, updated 2026-02-23, matched on the provider’s business name at its known office or on its website domain. A PTIN holder registers their own business name and address, so this counts who names this provider in that register and nothing more. It is not a headcount and it does not measure who a provider can call on: employees who file under a personal name, contract practitioners, of-counsel attorneys and professionals at partner firms do not appear here. The extract refreshes twice a year. The provider separately describes a team of tax professionals and CPAs. TRC publishes both figures because they are the two things a reader can check. They measure different things, and a difference between them is not by itself evidence that the provider’s statement is wrong.
View source